Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Pieger

State v. Pieger

683 A.2d 398, 239 Conn. 927, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 421
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 10, 1996
DocketSC 15546
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 A.2d 398 (State v. Pieger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pieger, 683 A.2d 398, 239 Conn. 927, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 421 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 460 (AC 13747), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court, in sentencing the defendant, could impose as part of the sentence or as a condition of probation the payment of a $2500 charitable ‘contribution’ to New Britain Hospital?”

[928]*928Decided October 10, 1996 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15546. Earle Giovanniello and Frank J. Riccio, in support of the petition. Lisa Herskowitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pieger
692 A.2d 1273 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 A.2d 398, 239 Conn. 927, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pieger-conn-1996.