State v. Pieger

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Pieger

683 A.2d 398, 239 Conn. 927, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 421

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 10, 1996·No. SC 15546·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 460 (AC 13747), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court, in sentencing the defendant, could impose as part of the sentence or as a condition of probation the payment of a $2500 charitable ‘contribution’ to New Britain Hospital?”

[928] Decided October 10, 1996 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15546. Earle Giovanniello and Frank J. Riccio, in support of the petition. Lisa Herskowitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 460 (AC 13747), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court, in sentencing the defendant, could impose as part of the sentence or as a condition of probation the payment of a $2500 charitable ‘contribution’ to New Britain Hospital?”

[928] Decided October 10, 1996 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15546. Earle Giovanniello and Frank J. Riccio, in support of the petition. Lisa Herskowitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. Pieger, 683 A.2d 398, 239 Conn. 927, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 421 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

683 A.2d 398 (State v. Pieger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related