State v. Picou

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Picou

621 So. 2d 822, 1993 La. LEXIS 2355, 1993 WL 305610

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 6, 1993

DocketNo. 92-KH-1970

StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 822 (State v. Picou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Picou, 621 So. 2d 822, 1993 La. LEXIS 2355, 1993 WL 305610 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Picou, Johnny; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 314-521; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KW-1139.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed [823]*823on or about September 4,1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Picou, Johnny; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 314-521; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KW-1139.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed [823]*823on or about September 4,1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 So. 2d 822, 1993 La. LEXIS 2355, 1993 WL 305610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-picou-la-1993.