State v. Pickles

65 Mo. 431
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 Mo. 431 (State v. Pickles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pickles, 65 Mo. 431 (Mo. 1877).

Opinion

Norton, J.

Defendant was indicted in the St. Louis Criminal Court, charged with an assault with intent to kill. At the January Term 1876 of said court judgment was entered up against him, from which he prosecuted his appeal to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, where, upon a hearing the judgment of the Criminal Court was affirmed. Erom [432]*432this judgment defendant has appealed to this Court. The record before us neither shows an indictment, arraignment, trial or verdict, and it has been repeatedly held that unless the record upon which this court has'to pass, affirmatively shows an arraignment, and the presence of the prisoner during the trial and at the rendition of the verdict, the judgment of the trial court cannot stand. State v. Barnett, 63 Mo. 300; State v. Jones, 61 Mo. 232; State v. Ott, 49 Mo. 326; State v. Montgomery, 63 Mo. 296. None of these things appearing on the record the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded to the Saint Louis Criminal Court. The other judges concur. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Taylor
20 S.W. 193 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Mo. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pickles-mo-1877.