State v. Pickett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State v. Pickett

710 S.E.2d 212, 309 Ga. App. 216, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1279, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 333

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 2011

DocketA09A1285

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 710 S.E.2d 212 (State v. Pickett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pickett, 710 S.E.2d 212, 309 Ga. App. 216, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1279, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 333 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

In State v. Pickett, 1 the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this court in State v. Pickett 2 and stated that this court had “erred in affirming rather than vacating the trial court’s judgment and remanding the case for the court to exercise its discretion again using properly-supported factual findings and the correct legal analysis.” 3 Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own in its stead, vacate the trial court’s judgment, and remand the case for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Smith, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur. *217 Marilyn Primovic, Ashleigh B. Merchant, for appellee.

1

288 Ga. 674 (706 SE2d 561) (2011).

2

301 Ga. App. 251 (687 SE2d 239) (2009).

3

Pickett, supra, 288 Ga. at 680.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

In State v. Pickett, 1 the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this court in State v. Pickett 2 and stated that this court had “erred in affirming rather than vacating the trial court’s judgment and remanding the case for the court to exercise its discretion again using properly-supported factual findings and the correct legal analysis.” 3 Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own in its stead, vacate the trial court’s judgment, and remand the case for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Smith, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur. *217 Marilyn Primovic, Ashleigh B. Merchant, for appellee.

1

288 Ga. 674 (706 SE2d 561) (2011).

2

301 Ga. App. 251 (687 SE2d 239) (2009).

3

Pickett, supra, 288 Ga. at 680.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

710 S.E.2d 212, 309 Ga. App. 216, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1279, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pickett-gactapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack