State v. Piceno
This text of 341 Or. App. 655 (State v. Piceno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 603 July 2, 2025 655
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON and City of Portland, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. MARCOS PICENO, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR51096; A181495
Celia A. Howes, Judge. Submitted June 6, 2025. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sara F. Werboff, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant. Denis M. Vannier and Fallon Niedrist de Guzman filed the brief for respondent City of Portland. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent State of Oregon. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Powers, Judge, and O’Connor, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Vinge, 337 Or App 621, 564 P3d 186 (2025).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 Or. App. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-piceno-orctapp-2025.