State v. Phua

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Phua. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Haw. 504
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2014·No. SCWC-11-0000686·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000686

03-APR-2014

04:26 PM

SCWC-11-0000686

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

HAN KAMAKANI PHUA,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000686; CASE NO. 3P810-0184)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.

and Circuit Judge Ochiai, in place of Acoba, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on February 20, 2014, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 3, 2014.

James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Dean E. Ochiai

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Phua, (haw 2014).

State v. Phua (State v. Phua) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.