State v. Phua
This text of State v. Phua (State v. Phua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000686 03-APR-2014 04:26 PM
SCWC-11-0000686
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
HAN KAMAKANI PHUA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000686; CASE NO. 3P810-0184)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Circuit Judge Ochiai, in place of Acoba, J., recused)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on February 20, 2014, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 3, 2014.
James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Dean E. Ochiai
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Phua, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phua-haw-2014.