Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips

718 P.2d 775, 79 Or. App. 224, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2716
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Phillips. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 Or. App. 316 →
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 7, 1986·No. 259189; CA A37718·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant’s brief fails to comply with ORAP 7.19. As a result, we are not only unable to tell whether the claimed errors were preserved, but the manner in which they claimed errors are presented appear to be highly misleading. The brief is stricken.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Phillips, 718 P.2d 775, 79 Or. App. 224, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2716 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

718 P.2d 775 (State v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.