State v. Phillips

718 P.2d 775, 79 Or. App. 224, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2716
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 7, 1986
Docket259189; CA A37718
StatusPublished

This text of 718 P.2d 775 (State v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Phillips, 718 P.2d 775, 79 Or. App. 224, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2716 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant’s brief fails to comply with ORAP 7.19. As a result, we are not only unable to tell whether the claimed errors were preserved, but the manner in which they claimed errors are presented appear to be highly misleading. The brief is stricken.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 P.2d 775, 79 Or. App. 224, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phillips-orctapp-1986.