State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Phillips

167 A.2d 175, 34 N.J. 63

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 23, 1961·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 N. J. Super. 70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. R. R. 1:2-1; Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v. Weiss, 20 N. J. 258 (1955); Starego v. Soboliski, 11 N. J. 29 (1952).

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hangman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 N. J. Super. 70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. R. R. 1:2-1; Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v. Weiss, 20 N. J. 258 (1955); Starego v. Soboliski, 11 N. J. 29 (1952).

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hangman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

State v. Phillips, 167 A.2d 175, 34 N.J. 63 (N.J. 1961).

Pincite

167 A.2d 175 (State v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related