State v. Phillips
This text of 167 A.2d 175 (State v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 N. J. Super. 70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. R. R. 1:2-1; Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v. Weiss, 20 N. J. 258 (1955); Starego v. Soboliski, 11 N. J. 29 (1952).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hangman—7.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.2d 175, 34 N.J. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phillips-nj-1961.