State v. Phillips

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Phillips

696 So. 2d 223, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 1664, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 1525, 1997 WL 295650

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 4, 1997·No. No. CR96-1664·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOODARD, Judge.

For the reasons given in the companion case hereto rendered this date under the caption State of Louisiana v. Kathryn Joe Peterson, 96-1663 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/4/97); 696 So.2d 211, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. The trial court is instructed to amend the commitment and minute entry of the sentence to reflect that the defendant is given credit for time served.

AFFIRMED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODARD, Judge.

For the reasons given in the companion case hereto rendered this date under the caption State of Louisiana v. Kathryn Joe Peterson, 96-1663 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/4/97); 696 So.2d 211, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. The trial court is instructed to amend the commitment and minute entry of the sentence to reflect that the defendant is given credit for time served.

AFFIRMED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

State v. Phillips, 696 So. 2d 223, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 1664, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 1525, 1997 WL 295650 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

696 So. 2d 223 (State v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related