Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips

696 So. 2d 223, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 1664, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 1525, 1997 WL 295650
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 4, 1997
DocketNo. CR96-1664
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 696 So. 2d 223 (State v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Phillips, 696 So. 2d 223, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 1664, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 1525, 1997 WL 295650 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

WOODARD, Judge.

For the reasons given in the companion case hereto rendered this date under the caption State of Louisiana v. Kathryn Joe Peterson, 96-1663 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/4/97); 696 So.2d 211, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. The trial court is instructed to amend the commitment and minute entry of the sentence to reflect that the defendant is given credit for time served.

AFFIRMED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Peterson
696 So. 2d 211 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 223, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 1664, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 1525, 1997 WL 295650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phillips-lactapp-1997.