State v. Phillips

Connecticut Superior Court

State v. Phillips

186 A.2d 571, 24 Conn. Super. Ct. 74, 24 Conn. Supp. 74, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 410, 1962 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 241

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJuly 31, 1962

DocketFile No. CR 14-493

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 186 A.2d 571 (State v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Phillips, 186 A.2d 571, 24 Conn. Super. Ct. 74, 24 Conn. Supp. 74, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 410, 1962 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 241 (Colo. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

The information charged that the defendant sold alcoholic liquor to a minor in violation of § 30-86 of the General Statutes. That statute, so far as relevant to the case, provides for a penalty to be imposed upon any person holding a permit to sell liquor issued by the liquor control commission who "sells or delivers alcoholic liquor to any minor." The defendant elected to be tried by the court. He was found guilty on December 20, 1961, and has appealed. On December 28, 1961, the court made a finding pursuant to the defendant's request therefor. On the next day, December 29, 1961, the defendant filed a motion asking the court "to extend the time for filing the brief . . . until January 22, 1962." On January 12, 1962, the state moved for a dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that the defendant failed to file an assignment of errors within the time fixed by the rules of this court. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.35.1.

The defendant, in his brief and on oral argument, claimed that the motion to extend the time within which to file a brief was the result of a stenographic error and that the motion should have read "to extend the time for filing the assignment of errors." The sole question before us is whether the appeal ought to be dismissed for failure to file an assignment of errors within the time prescribed by the rules of this court. In

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The information charged that the defendant sold alcoholic liquor to a minor in violation of § 30-86 of the General Statutes. That statute, so far as relevant to the case, provides for a penalty to be imposed upon any person holding a permit to sell liquor issued by the liquor control commission who "sells or delivers alcoholic liquor to any minor." The defendant elected to be tried by the court. He was found guilty on December 20, 1961, and has appealed. On December 28, 1961, the court made a finding pursuant to the defendant's request therefor. On the next day, December 29, 1961, the defendant filed a motion asking the court "to extend the time for filing the brief . . . until January 22, 1962." On January 12, 1962, the state moved for a dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that the defendant failed to file an assignment of errors within the time fixed by the rules of this court. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.35.1.

The defendant, in his brief and on oral argument, claimed that the motion to extend the time within which to file a brief was the result of a stenographic error and that the motion should have read "to extend the time for filing the assignment of errors." The sole question before us is whether the appeal ought to be dismissed for failure to file an assignment of errors within the time prescribed by the rules of this court. In

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.2d 571, 24 Conn. Super. Ct. 74, 24 Conn. Supp. 74, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 410, 1962 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-phillips-connsuperct-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack