State v. Philbrick

24 A. 955, 84 Me. 562, 1892 Me. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 21, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 24 A. 955 (State v. Philbrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Philbrick, 24 A. 955, 84 Me. 562, 1892 Me. LEXIS 136 (Me. 1892).

Opinion

Walton, J.

Illegal voting is an offense at common law. One who wilfully deposits more than one vote during the same balloting for a town officer is guilty of an offense for -which he may be indicted and tried, and, if found guilty, be punished by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of the court. So held in Com. v. Silsbee, 9 Mass. 417. And we think it is equally an offense for one to so vote for a school district officer at a school district meeting. It is equally corrupt, equally a fraud, and should receive the same punishment. We think the' indictment in this case is good, that the demurrer thereto was. properly overruled, and that the entry must be,

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Virgin, Libbey, Emery and Foster, JJ.„ concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Silsbee
9 Mass. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1812)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A. 955, 84 Me. 562, 1892 Me. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-philbrick-me-1892.