State v. Pharis

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Pharis

44 S.W. 1131, 142 Mo. 437, 1898 Mo. LEXIS 175

DecidedFebruary 1, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 44 S.W. 1131 (State v. Pharis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pharis, 44 S.W. 1131, 142 Mo. 437, 1898 Mo. LEXIS 175 (Mo. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Burgess, J.

The defendants were indicted in the circuit court of Bates county for felonious assault upon one A. S. Milhorn, the indictment charging the assault to have been committed by Charles E. Pharis with a large scale weight, of the weight of two pounds, which was then and there a deadly weapon,, and that his codefendant Thomas H. Pharis was then and there present aiding and abetting in said assault. Defendants were found guilty by a jury, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $100 each.

After unsuccessful motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, defendants appealed.

No bill of exceptions was filed in this cause. The defendants are not represented in this court. There being no error apparent of record, we can but affirm the judgment. It is so ordered.

Gantt, P. J., and Shebwood, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess, J.

The defendants were indicted in the circuit court of Bates county for felonious assault upon one A. S. Milhorn, the indictment charging the assault to have been committed by Charles E. Pharis with a large scale weight, of the weight of two pounds, which was then and there a deadly weapon,, and that his codefendant Thomas H. Pharis was then and there present aiding and abetting in said assault. Defendants were found guilty by a jury, and their punishment fixed at a fine of $100 each.

After unsuccessful motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, defendants appealed.

No bill of exceptions was filed in this cause. The defendants are not represented in this court. There being no error apparent of record, we can but affirm the judgment. It is so ordered.

Gantt, P. J., and Shebwood, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 S.W. 1131, 142 Mo. 437, 1898 Mo. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pharis-mo-1898.