State v. Pfaff

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Pfaff

20 Mo. App. 335, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 390

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Mo. App. 335 (State v. Pfaff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pfaff, 20 Mo. App. 335, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Thompson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted under section 5436 of the Revised Statutes, for selling liquor in a quantity less than one gallon without taking out a license as a-dram-shop keeper. He was found guilty, and his punishment' assessed at a fine of forty dollars, the same being the minimum punishment prescribed by the statute for the offence charged. Rev. Stat., sect. 5449. No appearance has been entered by either party in this court, and no assignment of errors, statement, or brief has been filed. In such a case, it is our duty, under the provisions of section 1993, Revised Statutes, to proceed upon the return of the appeal without delay, and to render judgment upon the record before us. We have looked through the record with, care, and, seeing no error therein, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court. It is so ordered.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted under section 5436 of the Revised Statutes, for selling liquor in a quantity less than one gallon without taking out a license as a-dram-shop keeper. He was found guilty, and his punishment' assessed at a fine of forty dollars, the same being the minimum punishment prescribed by the statute for the offence charged. Rev. Stat., sect. 5449. No appearance has been entered by either party in this court, and no assignment of errors, statement, or brief has been filed. In such a case, it is our duty, under the provisions of section 1993, Revised Statutes, to proceed upon the return of the appeal without delay, and to render judgment upon the record before us. We have looked through the record with, care, and, seeing no error therein, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court. It is so ordered.

All the judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Mo. App. 335, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pfaff-moctapp-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack