Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Petty

State v. Petty

2009 Ohio 1906, 121 Ohio St. 3d 607
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 29, 2009
Docket2009-0132
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 1906 (State v. Petty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Petty, 2009 Ohio 1906, 121 Ohio St. 3d 607 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to its ruling on appellant’s eleventh assignment of error below, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal. *608 James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten Pscholka-Gartner, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Shaw & Miller and Mark J. Miller, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Petty
2011 Ohio 2985 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 1906, 121 Ohio St. 3d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-petty-ohio-2009.