State v. Petty

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Petty

604 S.E.2d 366, 166 N.C. App. 762, 2004 N.C. App. LEXIS 2005

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 19, 2004

DocketNo. COA04-432

StatusPublished

This text of 604 S.E.2d 366 (State v. Petty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Petty, 604 S.E.2d 366, 166 N.C. App. 762, 2004 N.C. App. LEXIS 2005 (N.C. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

WYNN, Judge.

Defendant Demario Rashawn Petty appeals from judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding Defendant guilty of second degree murder. The trial court sentenced Defendant to a minimum term of 170 months and a maximum term of 213 months.

Defendant's counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel states that she "is unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal." Counsel has attached to the appellant's brief a copy of a letter she wrote to Defendant advising him he could file his own supplemental written arguments. Defendant has not personally filed anything.

After carefully reviewing the record, we are unable to findpossible error to support a meritorious appeal.

No error.

Judges TYSON and GEER concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI