State v. Petty

24 S.W. 1010, 119 Mo. 425, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 9
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 31, 1894·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Sheewood, J.

In order to constitute the crime of obtaining money or property by false pretenses, it is requisite that the false pretense should be either of a past event, or of some fact having a present existence, and it can not consist of a promise to do something or of some event to happen in the future. State v. Evers, 49 Mo. 542; State v. DeLay, 93 Mo. 98; State v. Kingsley, 108 Mo. 135

[426] Here the alleged false pretense by which defendant obtained the $10 from Meltabarger, was that he would ship Meltabarger a large quantity of goods and wares. Under the cases cited, the indictment alleges no offense,- and as the evidence preserved shows that the charge in the indictment is in accordance with the facts, we reverse the judgment and discharge the defendant.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Petty, 24 S.W. 1010, 119 Mo. 425, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 9 (Mo. 1894).

24 S.W. 1010 (State v. Petty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shaw
847 S.W.2d 768 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)
State v. Saveraid
583 S.W.2d 238 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
State v. Mullins.
237 S.W. 502 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
State v. Young
183 S.W. 305 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1916)
State v. Krouse
156 S.W. 727 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Horton v. State
85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 13 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1911)