State v. Pettit
Opinion
Filed 3/1/04 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2004 ND 50
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Timothy Pettit, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20030244
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail H. Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Cynthia Mae Feland (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (on brief), P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Pettit
No. 20030244
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Timothy Pettit appealed from a judgment of conviction, upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of class A felony, accomplice to manufacturing methamphetamine. On appeal, Pettit asserts there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and also asserts the trial court erred in allowing a witness to give hearsay testimony. We affirm the judgment of conviction under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2004 ND 50 (State v. Pettit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.