State v. Petrus
This text of 532 So. 2d 136 (State v. Petrus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Petrus, Ferdinand L.; —Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or re[137]*137medial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 211522; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW88-0893.
Granted. The ruling of the district court is set aside. The trial court erred in upsetting the judgment granting a new trial on the basis that the previous trial judge lacked jurisdiction. The matter is remanded to the district court to consider the merits of the state’s motion to vacate. The warrant and arrest order are also set aside, and bail is reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 So. 2d 136, 1988 La. LEXIS 1914, 1988 WL 111846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-petrus-la-1988.