State v. Petillo

250 So. 2d 264, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3507

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 7, 1971·No. No. 40599·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an Order entered by the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, in which Fla.Stat. § 800.03, F.S.A. was held unconstitutional.

The Order is reversed on authority of (Hoffman v. Carson, Fla., 250 So.2d 891, filed July 7, 1971.

The cause is remanded for continuation of the proceedings below.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an Order entered by the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, in which Fla.Stat. § 800.03, F.S.A. was held unconstitutional.

The Order is reversed on authority of (Hoffman v. Carson, Fla., 250 So.2d 891, filed July 7, 1971.

The cause is remanded for continuation of the proceedings below.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

State v. Petillo, 250 So. 2d 264, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3507 (Fla. 1971).

Pincite

250 So. 2d 264 (State v. Petillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.