State v. Peterson

885 S.W.2d 788, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1614
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Peterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 918
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1994·No. Nos. 62567, 65503·Published

Opinion

[789]*789 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of twenty-five years and twenty years respectively. Defendant also appeals from an order denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The appeals have been consolidated. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment and denial of post-conviction relief are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Peterson, 885 S.W.2d 788, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1614 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

885 S.W.2d 788 (State v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.