State v. Peters

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Peters

76 So. 702, 142 La. 249, 1917 La. LEXIS 1660

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 29, 1917

DocketNo. 22805

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 So. 702 (State v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Peters, 76 So. 702, 142 La. 249, 1917 La. LEXIS 1660 (La. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PROVO STX, J.

On the trial of the accused on an indictment charging that she did, on the 16th day of December, 1916, sell intoxicating liquors in the parish of Washington without having first obtained a license, the prosecution was allowed, over the objection of accused, to prove by four witnesses successively “the reputation of accused relative to selling whisky in that community.” The learned trial judge assigned as his reasons for the ruling that as this was the second time the accused had been before the court on the same charge, and as the person to whom the liquors were alleged to have been sold was absent from the parish with no possibility of his attendance •being secured, and as the case was not being tried by a jury but by himself, he was entitled “to know all the facts and the reputation of this woman as to her known habits of retailing liquors was a material fact.”

The court is, no doubt, entitled to be informed of all the relevant facts; but the only fact that the reputation of the accused would have a tendency to prove would be her character, and nothing is better settled in the criminal law than that the question of the character of the accused cannot be gone into until the accused himself has first put it at issue. 12 Oye. 413.

The judgment appealed from is therefore set aside, and the case is remanded for trial according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PROVO STX, J.

On the trial of the accused on an indictment charging that she did, on the 16th day of December, 1916, sell intoxicating liquors in the parish of Washington without having first obtained a license, the prosecution was allowed, over the objection of accused, to prove by four witnesses successively “the reputation of accused relative to selling whisky in that community.” The learned trial judge assigned as his reasons for the ruling that as this was the second time the accused had been before the court on the same charge, and as the person to whom the liquors were alleged to have been sold was absent from the parish with no possibility of his attendance •being secured, and as the case was not being tried by a jury but by himself, he was entitled “to know all the facts and the reputation of this woman as to her known habits of retailing liquors was a material fact.”

The court is, no doubt, entitled to be informed of all the relevant facts; but the only fact that the reputation of the accused would have a tendency to prove would be her character, and nothing is better settled in the criminal law than that the question of the character of the accused cannot be gone into until the accused himself has first put it at issue. 12 Oye. 413.

The judgment appealed from is therefore set aside, and the case is remanded for trial according to law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 So. 702, 142 La. 249, 1917 La. LEXIS 1660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-peters-la-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack