State v. Pete

493 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 464, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2590
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 4, 1986·No. No. 68030·Published

Opinions

ADKINS, Justice.

We have for review Pete v. State, 478 So.2d 375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), in which the district court held that the trial court had improperly applied the sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing rather than those in force at the time of the offense. The decision conflicts with our decision of State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), and we have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

In Jackson, we held that the trial court may sentence a defendant pursuant to guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing.

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is quashed.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur. • SHAW, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pete, 493 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 464, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2590 (Fla. 1986).

493 So. 2d 450 (State v. Pete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
478 So. 2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Pete v. State
478 So. 2d 375 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)