State v. Perwin

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

State v. Perwin

306 A.2d 488, 124 N.J. Super. 312, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 549

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedJune 19, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.2d 488 (State v. Perwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Perwin, 306 A.2d 488, 124 N.J. Super. 312, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 549 (N.J. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following a four-month jury trial defendant (Perwin) and three others were convicted of conspiracy to obtain money under false pretenses and defendant and one other were convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses. We affirmed. State v. Yormark, 117 N. J. Super. 315 (App. Div. 1971). Certification was denied, 60 N. J. 138 (1972), as was certiorari, 407 U. S. 925, 92 S. Ct. 2459, 32 L. Ed. 2d 812 (1972).

About 14 months subsequent to their convictions, defendant and Mulvaney moved for a new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence. Testimony was taken and the motion denied. Perwin appeals.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the trial judge in his written opinion reported at 120 N. J. Super. 177 (Law Div. 1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI