State v. Person
663 S.E.2d 311, 362 N.C. 340, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 490
Opinion
For the reasons given in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the appealable issue of right, that is whether defendant is entitled to a new trial on the charge of first-degree rape by acting in concert. As to that matter, the Court of Appeals is instructed to reinstate the judgment of the trial court. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not properly before this Court and its decision as to these issues remains undisturbed.
REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Person, 663 S.E.2d 311, 362 N.C. 340, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 490 (N.C. 2008).
663 S.E.2d 311 (State v. Person) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McKoy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2021
State v. Charleston
789 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
State v. Shaw
700 S.E.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Pinkerton
697 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Roughton
689 S.E.2d 246 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Parker
680 S.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State of North Carolina v. Tice
664 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)