State v. Perry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Perry

502 S.W.3d 722, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074, 2016 WL 6208404

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2016

DocketWD 78836

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 722 (State v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Perry, 502 S.W.3d 722, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074, 2016 WL 6208404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Darrell L. Perry appeals his convictions following a jury trial of two counts of felony possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202.¹ Perry argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal, in finding him guilty, and imposing judgment and sentence for possession of a controlled substance for the methamphetamine found in the pill bottle from the center console of the car in which he was a passenger and the methamphetamine from the glass pipe found in the bandana he pulled from his pocket. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Darrell L. Perry appeals his convictions following a jury trial of two counts of felony possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202.¹ Perry argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal, in finding him guilty, and imposing judgment and sentence for possession of a controlled substance for the methamphetamine found in the pill bottle from the center console of the car in which he was a passenger and the methamphetamine from the glass pipe found in the bandana he pulled from his pocket. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 722, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074, 2016 WL 6208404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perry-moctapp-2016.