State v. Perkins

63 N.H. 89
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 N.H. 89 (State v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Perkins, 63 N.H. 89 (N.H. 1884).

Opinion

Stanley, J.

The motion to quash should have been granted. The police court had no authority to impose a fine upon the respondent. -He pleaded not guilty, and on this plea the court could not legally do more than determine whether there was probable cause to believe the respondent guilty, and, if satisfied that there was, order him to recognize for his appearance at the trial term of this court (G. L., c. 109, ss. 20, 21, 22); and the only remedy for the violation of law alleged in this complaint being by indictment, the court at the trial term had no jurisdiction to try the case on appeal. It is unnecessary to consider the other questions raised by the motion.

Motion granted.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bickford v. Franconia
60 A. 98 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1905)
State v. Williams
42 A. 898 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.H. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perkins-nh-1884.