State v. Perkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Perkins

423 S.W.3d 308, 2014 WL 721388, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 205

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 2014·No. No. ED 99591·Published

Opinion

[309] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Perkins appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of resisting arrest. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in accepting the jury’s verdict as to resisting arrest.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[309] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Perkins appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of resisting arrest. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in accepting the jury’s verdict as to resisting arrest.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Perkins, 423 S.W.3d 308, 2014 WL 721388, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 205 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

423 S.W.3d 308 (State v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.