State v. Perkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Perkins

401 S.W.3d 593, 2013 WL 3229715, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 773

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2013·No. No. WD 73740·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Perkins appeals his convictions and sentences for driving while revoked, in violation of section 302.321, and driving while intoxicated (chronic offender), in violation of section 577.010. Perkins asserts three claims of evidentiary error: (1) improper admission and publication to the jury of a redacted version of his driving record; (2) improper exclusion of testimony from Perkins’s wife supporting his defense; and (3) improper exclusion of evidence related to the investigating officer’s character for truth and veracity. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Perkins appeals his convictions and sentences for driving while revoked, in violation of section 302.321, and driving while intoxicated (chronic offender), in violation of section 577.010. Perkins asserts three claims of evidentiary error: (1) improper admission and publication to the jury of a redacted version of his driving record; (2) improper exclusion of testimony from Perkins’s wife supporting his defense; and (3) improper exclusion of evidence related to the investigating officer’s character for truth and veracity. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Perkins, 401 S.W.3d 593, 2013 WL 3229715, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 773 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

401 S.W.3d 593 (State v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.