State v. Perkins

333 S.W.3d 539, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2011 WL 900406
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 94651·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Perkins (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a bench trial convicting him of second-degree burglary, a felony, and misdemeanor stealing. Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to exclude a recording of a witness’s 911 call in violation his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Perkins, 333 S.W.3d 539, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2011 WL 900406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

333 S.W.3d 539 (State v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCray
333 S.W.3d 539 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)