State v. Perez
926 N.E.2d 314, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1424
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Ohio St. 3d 122 →
Opinion
Clark C.P. No. 03-CR-10I0. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel to file an application for reopening. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and that Luigia Tenuta of Columbus, Ohio, is appointed to represent appellant in this ease for the purpose of filing an application for reopening.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Perez, 926 N.E.2d 314, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2010).
926 N.E.2d 314 (State v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.