State v. Perez Jr.
This text of State v. Perez Jr. (State v. Perez Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 9, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
No. 3D16-1921 Lower Tribunal No. 09-30724 B ________________
The State of Florida, Petitioner,
vs.
Adolfo Perez, Jr., et al., Respondents.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
Daniel Tibbitt, for respondents.
Before SUAREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
SUAREZ, C.J.
Because we find the trial judge should have disqualified himself, we grant
the petition for writ of prohibition. We conclude that the motion for
disqualification was legally sufficient, and that the trial judge's comments were such that the facts alleged would place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not
receiving a fair and impartial trial. See Livingston v. State, 441 So. 2d 1083, 1087
(Fla. 1983). Once a basis for disqualification has been established, prohibition is
both an appropriate and necessary remedy. Brown v. Rowe, 96 Fla. 289, 118 So. 9
(1928). Accordingly, the writ of prohibition must issue and we direct the trial judge
to disqualify himself in all proceedings presently pending in lower court case
number F09-30724B. We therefore grant the petition for writ of prohibition, but
being confident that the trial judge will withdraw, we conclude that we need not
formally issue the writ.
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Perez Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perez-jr-fladistctapp-2016.