State v. Perez-Echeniquez

2025 Ohio 590
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 24, 2025
DocketCA2024-12-025
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 Ohio 590 (State v. Perez-Echeniquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Perez-Echeniquez, 2025 Ohio 590 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Perez-Echeniquez, 2025-Ohio-590.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

MADISON COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, :

Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2024-12-025

: OPINION - vs - 2/24/2025 :

FREDDY A. PEREZ-ECHENIQUEZ, :

Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM MADISON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CRI20240017

Nicholas A. Adkins, Madison County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael S. Klamo, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Culp, Parsons, and Murray LLC, and Joshua W. Beasley, for appellant.

PIPER, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Freddy A. Perez-Echeniquez, appeals the sentence he received

from the Madison County Court of Common Pleas following his guilty plea to one count

of third-degree felony illegal conveyance of drugs onto the grounds of a specified

governmental facility.1 For the reasons outlined below, the trial court's sentence is

1. Pursuant to Loc.R. 6(A), we sua sponte remove this appeal from the accelerated calendar for purposes of issuing this opinion. Madison CA2024-12-025

reversed and this matter is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of

resentencing Perez-Echeniquez in accordance with R.C. 2929.16(A)(2).

{¶ 2} On September 6, 2024, Perez-Echeniquez pled guilty to one count of third-

degree felony illegal conveyance of drugs onto the grounds of a specified governmental

facility in violation of R.C. 2921.36(A)(2). The following month, on October 18, 2024, the

trial court sentenced Perez-Echeniquez to serve two years of community control that

included a community residential sanction of one year in jail, six months more than what

was statutorily permissible under R.C. 2929.16(A)(2). With leave, Perez-Echeniquez filed

a delayed notice of appeal on December 18, 2024. Following briefing, on February 5,

2025, Perez-Echeniquez's appeal was submitted to this court for consideration. Perez-

Echeniquez's appeal now properly before this court for decision, Perez-Echeniquez has

raised one assignment of error for review.

{¶ 3} THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING DEFENDANT TO A TERM

OF INCARCERATION LONGER THAN ALLOWABLE UNDER O.R.C. 2929.16(A)(2).

{¶ 4} In his single assignment of error, Perez-Echeniquez argues the trial court

sentenced him to serve a longer jail term than what was statutorily permissible under R.C.

2929.16(A)(2). Pursuant to that statute, the trial court had the authority to sentence

Perez-Echeniquez to a community residential sanction of a term of up to six months in

jail. The trial court, however, sentenced Perez-Echeniquez to serve a one-year jail term.

{¶ 5} The state concedes, and we agree, that the one-year jail term the trial court

imposed upon Perez-Echeniquez exceeded the trial court's statutory authority under R.C.

2929.16(A)(2), thereby rendering the trial court's sentence otherwise contrary to law in

violation of R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)(b). Therefore, finding merit to Perez-Echeniquez's single

assignment of error, the trial court's sentence is hereby reversed and this matter is

remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of resentencing Perez-Echeniquez in

-2- Madison CA2024-12-025

accordance with R.C. 2929.16(A)(2).

{¶ 6} Judgment reversed and remanded for resentencing.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., and M. POWELL, J., concur.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2929.16
Ohio § 2929.16

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 Ohio 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perez-echeniquez-ohioctapp-2025.