State v. Perez

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Perez

713 A.2d 916, 48 Conn. App. 906, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 143

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 Conn. App. 385 →

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided March 24, 1998·No. AC 16274·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).

The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. After a review of the briefs, record, transcripts and the findings of the trial court, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).

The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. After a review of the briefs, record, transcripts and the findings of the trial court, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment is affirmed.

State v. Perez, 713 A.2d 916, 48 Conn. App. 906, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 143 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

713 A.2d 916 (State v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.