State v. Perez

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Perez

713 A.2d 916, 48 Conn. App. 906, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 143

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1998

DocketAC 16274

StatusPublished

This text of 713 A.2d 916 (State v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Perez, 713 A.2d 916, 48 Conn. App. 906, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 143 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).

The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. After a review of the briefs, record, transcripts and the findings of the trial court, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).

The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence. After a review of the briefs, record, transcripts and the findings of the trial court, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 A.2d 916, 48 Conn. App. 906, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-perez-connappct-1998.