State v. Pepka
885 N.E.2d 250, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1484
Opinion
Lake App. No. 2008-L-016. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It [1485] appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 28, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pepka, 885 N.E.2d 250, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1484 (Ohio 2008).
885 N.E.2d 250 (State v. Pepka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.