State v. Pennington

667 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 625, 1996 WL 39585
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 1996
DocketNo. 95-01978
StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 483 (State v. Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pennington, 667 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 625, 1996 WL 39585 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

BLUE, Acting Chief Judge.

The State appeals the downward departure sentence imposed on Lisa Pennington. We agree with the State’s argument that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to provide written reasons in support of the departure sentence. Because we are reversing a sentence that was based on a plea agreement with the trial judge, Pennington must be given an opportunity to withdraw her plea. See State v. Scott, 611 So.2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Accordingly, we reverse Pennington’s departure sentence and remand for further proceedings.

LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Scott
611 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 483, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 625, 1996 WL 39585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pennington-fladistctapp-1996.