State v. Pendergraft

505 P.3d 1097, 318 Or. App. 433
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 16, 2022
DocketA173372
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 P.3d 1097 (State v. Pendergraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pendergraft, 505 P.3d 1097, 318 Or. App. 433 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Submitted January 18, reversed and remanded March 16, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CARL BOYD PENDERGRAFT, Defendant-Appellant. Jefferson County Circuit Court 19CR76848; A173372 505 P3d 1097

Daina A. Vitolins, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Francis C. Gieringer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the briefs for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Kamins, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. State v. Prophet, 318 Or App 330, 507 P3d 735 (2022).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Waterman
511 P.3d 78 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 P.3d 1097, 318 Or. App. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pendergraft-orctapp-2022.