State v. Pendergraft
776 S.E.2d 679, 368 N.C. 314, 2015 WL 5656848, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 932
Opinion
Justice ERVIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pendergraft, 776 S.E.2d 679, 368 N.C. 314, 2015 WL 5656848, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 932 (N.C. 2015).
776 S.E.2d 679 (State v. Pendergraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jenkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
Desmond v. The News & Observer Publ'g Co.
823 S.E.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
State v. Hardison
779 S.E.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)