State v. Pena

683 P.2d 743, 140 Ariz. 544, 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 233
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedMay 7, 1984
Docket6105-PR
StatusPublished
Cited by38 cases

This text of 683 P.2d 743 (State v. Pena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pena, 683 P.2d 743, 140 Ariz. 544, 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 233 (Ark. 1984).

Opinion

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

The appellant Sebastian Pena escaped from the Maricopa County Jail where he had been confined awaiting trial on eight felony charges in case CR-124947. He was subsequently apprehended and indicted for escape in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2503. The appellant pled guilty to the escape charge and admitted two prior felony convictions. He was sentenced to the presumptive term of five years with the sentence to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in case CR-124947.

The appellant filed a timely appeal raising the single issue whether a mandatory consecutive sentence is required by A.R.S. § 13-2503 under the circumstances of this case. The court of appeals held that a mandatory consecutive sentence was not required, set aside the sentence and remanded the case for resentencing. We accepted the state’s petition for review to resolve the conflict between this case and State v. Henderson, 133 Ariz. 259, 650 P.2d 1241 (App.1982).

The analysis of the statute, A.R.S. § 13-2503, by the court of appeals in the instant case appears to be well reasoned and correct; therefore, we overrule the holding in State v. Henderson, supra. We approve and adopt the decision of the court of appeals in this case. State v. Sebastian Pena, 140 Ariz. 545, 683 P.2d 744 (App. 1983).

GORDON, Y.C.J., and HAYS, CAMERON and FELDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Arizona v. Edwardo Serrato III
Arizona Supreme Court, 2025
Whitestar v. Medmen
Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2023
State of Arizona v. Kevin Artice Miles
414 P.3d 680 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2018)
David Garcia v. State of Arizona
146 P.3d 1007 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
State v. Munninger
142 P.3d 701 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
State v. Pena
104 P.3d 873 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2005)
State v. Sanchez
97 P.3d 891 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2004)
State of Arizona v. Rene A. Sanchez
Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2004
State v. Fell
52 P.3d 218 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2002)
State v. Ossana
18 P.3d 1258 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2001)
State v. Johnson
991 P.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1999)
State v. Garcia
943 P.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1997)
NMP Corp. v. Parametric Technology Corp.
958 F. Supp. 1536 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1997)
State v. Tarango
914 P.2d 1300 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1996)
Zamora v. Superior Court
904 P.2d 1294 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
Reinesto v. Superior Court
894 P.2d 733 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
State v. Carnegie
850 P.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1993)
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196
834 P.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
Vo v. Superior Court
836 P.2d 408 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
State v. McCuin
808 P.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 P.2d 743, 140 Ariz. 544, 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pena-ariz-1984.