State v. Pelham

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Pelham

156 P. 1141, 29 Idaho 52, 1916 Ida. LEXIS 54

DecidedApril 26, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 156 P. 1141 (State v. Pelham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Pelham, 156 P. 1141, 29 Idaho 52, 1916 Ida. LEXIS 54 (Idaho 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

MORGAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the district court of the eighth judicial district in and for Kootenai county, of a violation of ordinance No. 78 of the village of Post Falls, providing for the licensing and regulation of the business or occupation of conducting, within that village, horseraces or any contest of speed or endurance of man or beast for hire or profit, or for which an admission fee is charged, and making a violation thereof a misdemeanor, and form an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. This is a companion case to that of State v. Bird, ante, p. 47, 156 Pac. 1140.

. Upon the authority of said case of State v. Bird, the judgment of conviction in this ease is affirmed. Costs are awarded to respondent.

Sullivan, C. J., and Budge, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORGAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the district court of the eighth judicial district in and for Kootenai county, of a violation of ordinance No. 78 of the village of Post Falls, providing for the licensing and regulation of the business or occupation of conducting, within that village, horseraces or any contest of speed or endurance of man or beast for hire or profit, or for which an admission fee is charged, and making a violation thereof a misdemeanor, and form an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. This is a companion case to that of State v. Bird, ante, p. 47, 156 Pac. 1140.

. Upon the authority of said case of State v. Bird, the judgment of conviction in this ease is affirmed. Costs are awarded to respondent.

Sullivan, C. J., and Budge, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 P. 1141, 29 Idaho 52, 1916 Ida. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pelham-idaho-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack