State v. Peete

314 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 777, 2010 WL 2284225
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 8, 2010
DocketED 93094
StatusPublished

This text of 314 S.W.3d 776 (State v. Peete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Peete, 314 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 777, 2010 WL 2284225 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Peete appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of rape, sodomy and child molestation in the first degree. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 S.W.3d 776, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 777, 2010 WL 2284225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-peete-moctapp-2010.