State v. Peeples

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Peeples

302 S.W.3d 783, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 103, 2010 WL 363403

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 2010·No. No. ED 93051·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Peeples appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of leaving the scene, resisting arrest, endangering a child, and second-degree assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Peeples appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of leaving the scene, resisting arrest, endangering a child, and second-degree assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Peeples, 302 S.W.3d 783, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 103, 2010 WL 363403 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 783 (State v. Peeples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.