State v. Peede

124 S.E.2d 134, 256 N.C. 460, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 462
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 28, 1962·No. 76·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant having demanded a jury trial in both cases in the Craven County Recorder’s Court, the jurisdiction of the Recorder’s Court was ousted and the Superior Court of Craven County vested with exclusive original jurisdiction of the charges laid in the warrants. Therefore, the jurisdiction of the Superior Court was not derivative but original, and it was necessary for defendant to be tried on bills of indictment and not upon the original warrants. S. v. Norman, 237 N.C. 205, 74 S.E. 2d 602; S. v. Davis, 253 N.C. 224, 116 S.E. 2d 381.

The assignments of error present no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment imposed is not in excess of that provided by law.

No error.

WlNBORNE, C.J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Peede, 124 S.E.2d 134, 256 N.C. 460, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 462 (N.C. 1962).

124 S.E.2d 134 (State v. Peede) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mobley
160 S.E.2d 334 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Lawrence
160 S.E.2d 77 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Smith
142 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
State v. Evans
137 S.E.2d 811 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)