State v. Pedersen
This text of 325 Mont. 28 (State v. Pedersen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On May 21, 2002, the defendant was sentenced to a Five (5) year commitment to the Department of Corrections, with recommendation for placement in a pre-release center or the Intensive Supervision Program for the offense of violations of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony.
On April 1,2004, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was not present, but was represented by Meghan LulfSutton. The state was not represented.
Ms. Lulf-Sutton advised the Sentence Review Division that she spoke with the defendant’s counsel, Mr. Vince Van der Hagen. Mr. Van der Hagen advised Ms. Lulf-Sutton that he spoke with the defendant and the defendant advised that he did not wish to proceed with a hearing before the Sentence Review Division.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence shall be dismissed.
Done in open Court this 1st day of April, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 Mont. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pedersen-mont-2004.