Home/Court of Appeals of Arizona/State v. Pecina

State v. Pecina

936 P.2d 1280, 188 Ariz. 386, 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 61
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pecina. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 Ariz. 238 →
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided April 15, 1997·No. No. 1 CA-CR 94-0631·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The court has considered the appellant’s motion for order recalling mandate/granting leave to to file delayed petition for review by supreme court in propria persona. No response has been filed. Former counsel has submitted an affidavit stating that appellant received erroneous advice concerning the ne[387] cessity of filing a petition for review. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of this court shall recall the order and mandate issued on January 17,1996.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED allowing appellant to and including May 16, 1997, in which to file a petition for review.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the superior court shall retain all records, exhibits and other matters previously returned to the superior court pursuant to the mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pecina, 936 P.2d 1280, 188 Ariz. 386, 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 61 (Ark. Ct. App. 1997).

936 P.2d 1280 (State v. Pecina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.