State v. Pearson
This text of 2013 ND 89 (State v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND89
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Carmen Camille Pearson, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20120437-20120439
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Pearson
[¶1] Carmen Pearson appealed from a district court judgment revoking her probation. On appeal, Pearson argues the district court abused its discretion by revoking her probation. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pearson-nd-2013.