State v. Pearson

2013 ND 89
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided June 19, 2013·No. 20120437·Published

Opinion

Filed 6/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2013 ND89

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Carmen Camille Pearson, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20120437-20120439

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Pearson

Nos. 20120437-20120439

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Carmen Pearson appealed from a district court judgment revoking her probation. On appeal, Pearson argues the district court abused its discretion by revoking her probation. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pearson, 2013 ND 89 (N.D. 2013).

2013 ND 89 (State v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.