State v. Pearson
111 S.W.3d 428, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 549, 2003 WL 1907829
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pearson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 816 →
Opinion
ORDER
Carl Pearson appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of assault in the third degree. He was ordered to pay a fine of $300. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pearson, 111 S.W.3d 428, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 549, 2003 WL 1907829 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
111 S.W.3d 428 (State v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.