Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Pearson

State v. Pearson

476 So. 2d 760, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16314
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1985
DocketNo. 84-416
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 476 So. 2d 760 (State v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pearson, 476 So. 2d 760, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court upholding the “knock and announce” Rule of Exclusion, as has the Fourth District Court of Appeal, See Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and as they have done, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question as one of great public interest.

[761]*761“Does the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule apply in probation revocation proceedings in light of the 1983 amendment to Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution?”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pearson
487 So. 2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State v. Uriguen
486 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 So. 2d 760, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pearson-fladistctapp-1985.