State v. Pearson
476 So. 2d 760, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1985·No. No. 84-416·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order of the trial court upholding the “knock and announce” Rule of Exclusion, as has the Fourth District Court of Appeal, See Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and as they have done, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question as one of great public interest.
[761] “Does the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule apply in probation revocation proceedings in light of the 1983 amendment to Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution?”
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Pearson, 476 So. 2d 760, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
476 So. 2d 760 (State v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pearson
487 So. 2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State v. Uriguen
486 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)