State v. Payton

570 P.2d 666, 30 Or. App. 823, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1725
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 29, 1977·No. No. B37-183, CA 8557·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s statement of facts does not comply with DCAR 5.5 — the rules which govern appeals from district court to this court. Defendant has made no attempt to make reference to the place in the audio record where any particular statement of fact appears.

Appeal dismissed. See State v. Busch, 30 Or App 835, 567 P2d 1095 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Payton, 570 P.2d 666, 30 Or. App. 823, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1725 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

570 P.2d 666 (State v. Payton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Busch
567 P.2d 1095 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)