State v. Payton

570 P.2d 666, 30 Or. App. 823, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1725
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 29, 1977
DocketNo. B37-183, CA 8557
StatusPublished

This text of 570 P.2d 666 (State v. Payton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Payton, 570 P.2d 666, 30 Or. App. 823, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1725 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s statement of facts does not comply with DCAR 5.5 — the rules which govern appeals from district court to this court. Defendant has made no attempt to make reference to the place in the audio record where any particular statement of fact appears.

Appeal dismissed. See State v. Busch, 30 Or App 835, 567 P2d 1095 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Busch
567 P.2d 1095 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 P.2d 666, 30 Or. App. 823, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-payton-orctapp-1977.