State v. Payton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Payton

825 S.W.2d 683, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 543

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Payton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 483 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 1992·No. Nos. 58091, 58172 and 60031·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo.Supp.1991. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent sexual offender to 30 years imprisonment. We affirm. The trial court did not err, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo.Supp.1991. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent sexual offender to 30 years imprisonment. We affirm. The trial court did not err, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Payton, 825 S.W.2d 683, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 543 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

825 S.W.2d 683 (State v. Payton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.