State v. Payne

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Payne

540 S.W.3d 408

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104498

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 408 (State v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Payne, 540 S.W.3d 408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*409Tina Payne ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting her of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, a class B felony in violation of Section 195.211 (RSMo. 2000 ), and possession of a controlled substance, a class C felony in violation of Section 195.202. Appellant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for each count, with all sentences to run concurrently.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*409Tina Payne ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting her of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, a class B felony in violation of Section 195.211 (RSMo. 2000 ), and possession of a controlled substance, a class C felony in violation of Section 195.202. Appellant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for each count, with all sentences to run concurrently.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-payne-moctapp-2017.